How Can We Attract More Medical Students to Radiology? 

Thursday, December 5, 2024

By Jennie McKee

Results of a large survey presented Wednesday may help illuminate opportunities for increasing interest in pursuing a career in the specialty.

Magdalena Seng, MD
Seng

The majority of medical students who responded to a large European survey noted that they would not pursue a career in radiology. Some of the reasons cited included perceived lack of patient interaction and concerns about the impact of AI.

“We focused on the appeal of radiology due to how the global workload for radiologists is growing, while the available workforce has remained relatively stable,” said Magdalena Seng, MD, of the Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine at University Hospital Basel in Switzerland. “This makes recruiting future doctors into the specialty crucial.”

By conducting the survey, Dr. Seng and colleagues aimed to better understand medical students' perceptions of radiology, with a goal of identifying ways to improve the medical curriculum and enhance interest in the field.

Surveying Medical Students

The researchers distributed an 18-question survey about radiology to medical students at 21 universities across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. A total of 1,184 students participated in the survey (753 females), which asked for opinions on subjects including: 
  • Radiology’s clinical relevance
  • Salary expectations
  • Work-life balance
  • Job attractiveness
  • The role of AI in radiology
  • Radiology’s future

Assessing and Interpreting Results

The survey found that 64% of students ruled out a career in radiology, citing limited patient interaction (62%) and AI's impact on the field (33%) as deterrents. 

Despite this, most viewed salary (77%) and work-life balance (67%) as being appealing aspects of a radiology career.

“While I expected some hesitation among medical students regarding a career in radiology, the extent of their concerns about limited patient interaction, lack of hands-on experiences and fears about AI's impact was more pronounced than I anticipated,” Dr. Seng said. 

The data indicated that students who could envision a career in radiology preferred to work fewer hours compared to those who ruled it out; however, there was no significant difference in salary expectations between students who could and could not see themselves pursuing radiology as a career, she noted.

In Dr. Seng’s view, educational initiatives should focus on increased clinical exposure to radiology to make the specialty more appealing. 

“This includes introducing courses on AI integration and providing more hands-on experiences—such as reporting, ultrasound or interventional radiology—to highlight the specialty’s impact on patient care,” she noted.

According to the survey results, prior exposure to radiology appeared to significantly affect students’ perceptions of radiology’s clinical role, attractiveness and career prospects.

“Students who were exposed to radiology during medical school training, reported higher levels of interest and perceived importance of the field,” Dr. Seng added. 

 

Access the presentation, “Counting Coins in the Dark – Future Doctors’ Views on Radiology,” (W1-SSNPM03-4) on demand at RSNA.org/MeetingCentral